Lyman v. Bond
130 Mass. 291, 1881 Mass. LEXIS 78
Opinion
The plaintiff is not barred of his action by any agreement of his own; because he has made no agreement to that effect. He is not barred by the proceedings under the statute of New Hampshire; because if such would be the effect of proceedings under that statute (which we need not decide) it is an insolvent law, the operation of which was suspended during the existence of the Bankrupt Act of the United States.
Judgment for the plaintiff
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lyman v. Bond, 130 Mass. 291, 1881 Mass. LEXIS 78 (Mass. 1881).
130 Mass. 291 (Lyman v. Bond) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Goldstein v. COLUMBIA DIAMOND RING CO. INC.
323 N.E.2d 344 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1975)
Jacobs v. E. Bement's Sons
126 N.W. 1043 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1910)
Moody v. Port Clyde Development Co.
66 A. 967 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1907)
In re Salmon & Salmon
143 F. 395 (W.D. Missouri, 1906)