Lyles v. Styles

15 F. Cas. 1143, 2 Wash. C. C. 224
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania·Decided October 15, 1808·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

WASHINGTON, Circuit Justice (charging jury).

The plaintiff and defendant were jointly concerned in this adventure, and the defendant had the power and interest of a partner, as to its disposition. The letter from the plaintiff to the defendant, is improperly called a letter of instructions, or even an agreement by defendant, to sell for cash or produce. The plaintiff had a right to advise, but not to order; and such is the style of the letter. If you are of opinion that the conduct of the defendant was perfectly fair, then there is no ground upon which to charge him with the loss of these bills.

The jury, as to this part of the account, found according to the charge.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lyles v. Styles, 15 F. Cas. 1143, 2 Wash. C. C. 224 (circtdpa 1808).

15 F. Cas. 1143 (Lyles v. Styles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lind v. Webber
36 Nev. 623 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1913)
Gamble v. Hanchett
35 Nev. 319 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1912)
Jenkins v. Peckinpaugh
40 Ind. 133 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1872)
Tucker v. Judd
3 Haw. 180 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1870)