Lyles v. State

481 S.W.3d 601, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 90, 2016 WL 513513
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 9, 2016
DocketNo. ED 102704
StatusPublished

This text of 481 S.W.3d 601 (Lyles v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lyles v. State, 481 S.W.3d 601, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 90, 2016 WL 513513 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Curtis Lyles appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.0351 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary héaring. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k); Brooks v. State, 242 S.W.3d 705, 708 (Mo. banc 2008). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the réasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brooks v. State
242 S.W.3d 705 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
481 S.W.3d 601, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 90, 2016 WL 513513, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lyles-v-state-moctapp-2016.