Lyles v. Lyles

911 So. 2d 273, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 15476, 2005 WL 2396414
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 30, 2005·No. No. 5D04-579·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.1

We affirm the final judgment of dissolution of marriage except to the extent that it limits the location where the wife, Ronda Gay Lyles, may reside with the child of this marriage to within a fifty mile radius of Ocala. While there are sufficient findings based on substantial competent evidence contained in the record for the trial court to deny the request of the wife to move the residence of the child to Oklahoma, there is no sound basis in the record for the fifty mile restriction. We, therefore, vacate the fifty-mile restriction, and remand for the entry of an amended final judgment that limits the residency of the child to the State of Florida.

AFFIRMED in part. REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

PALMER, ORFINGER and MONACO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lyles v. Lyles, 911 So. 2d 273, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 15476, 2005 WL 2396414 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

911 So. 2d 273 (Lyles v. Lyles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.