Lyle v. Lyle

72 A.D.2d 597, 421 N.Y.S.2d 98, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13708
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 29, 1979
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 72 A.D.2d 597 (Lyle v. Lyle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lyle v. Lyle, 72 A.D.2d 597, 421 N.Y.S.2d 98, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13708 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Opinion

In an action in which the parties had been granted a judgment of divorce on the ground of their having lived separate and apart in excess of two years pursuant to a judgment of separation entered in favor of the defendant wife, (1) defendant appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated October 23, 1978, as (a) terminated plaintiff’s support payments for the parties’ two eldest children, aged 20 and 19, respectively, as of the date of the order, (b) denied her application for increased alimony and support payments, and (c) awarded an attorney’s fee of only $1,500, and (2) plaintiff cross-appeals from so much of the same order as awarded defendant a counsel fee. Order modified, on the law, by deleting the first four decretal paragraphs thereof, and substituting therefor a provision that the children are entitled to paternal support in the amount decreed until each has attained the age of 21 years or has earlier become emancipated. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. Under section 413 of the Family Court Act, as amended effective September 1, 1974 (L 1974, ch 937, § 2), a father’s obligation to support his minor children extends to "a child under the age of twenty-one years” (see Bordenka v Bordenka, 59 AD2d 520). On this record we see no reason to depart from the statutory requirement. The alimony and support provisions were otherwise fair and equitable in the light of the parties’ respective incomes and expenses, as was the counsel fee awarded at Special Term. Mangano, J. P., Rabin, Margett and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Henry v. Boyd
99 A.D.2d 382 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
MacFadden v. Martini
119 Misc. 2d 94 (NYC Family Court, 1983)
Schiffman v. Schiffman
79 A.D.2d 971 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
72 A.D.2d 597, 421 N.Y.S.2d 98, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13708, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lyle-v-lyle-nyappdiv-1979.