Lyle v. Harris

1 White & W. 31
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 9, 1880·No. No. 676, Op. Book No. 3, p. 422·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§71. General demurrer; legal effect of . The legal effect of a general demurrer is to admit the facts pleaded to be true, but to deny that they constitute a cause of action or ground of defense. [Zacharie v. Bryan, 2 Tex. 274.] And the only question which will be considered under it is whether any cause of action or ground of defense is disclosed in the pleading demurred to. [Warner v. Bailey, 7 Tex. 517.] If sufficient be stated in the pleading demurred to, to enable the court to see that a good cause of action or ground of defense exists, however defectively stated, a general demurrer will not be sustained. [Williams v. Warnell, 28 Tex. 611; Edgar v. Galveston, 46 Tex. 421.]

Eeversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lyle v. Harris, 1 White & W. 31 (Tex. Ct. App. 1880).

1 White & W. 31 (Lyle v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Zacharie v. Bryan
2 Tex. 274 (Texas Supreme Court, 1847)
Warner v. Bailey
7 Tex. 517 (Texas Supreme Court, 1852)
Edgar v. Galveston City Co.
46 Tex. 421 (Texas Supreme Court, 1877)