Lyle, George Randall

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 24, 2015
DocketWR-83,383-01
StatusPublished

This text of Lyle, George Randall (Lyle, George Randall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lyle, George Randall, (Tex. 2015).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-83,383-01

EX PARTE GEORGE RANDALL LYLE, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 13229-A IN THE 344TH DISTRICT COURT FROM CHAMBERS COUNTY

Per curiam.

ORDER

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated sexual

assault and sentenced to five years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction.

Applicant contends that he was incompetent when he pleaded guilty and that the trial judge

told him that he would be sentenced to ninety-nine years if he did not plead guilty.

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Ex parte Patterson, 993

S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As 2

we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the

appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to

Applicant’s claim that he was incompetent. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX . CODE

CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

Applicant appears to be represented by counsel. If he is not and the trial court elects to hold

a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to

be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent him at the hearing.

TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant

was incompetent when he pleaded guilty. It shall also determine whether the trial judge told

Applicant that he would be sentenced to ninety-nine years if he did not plead guilty and, if so, this

rendered Applicant’s plea involuntary. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and

conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claims

for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. The plea papers shall also be

forwarded to this Court with the supplemental record. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from

this Court.

Filed: June 24, 2015 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Rodriguez
334 S.W.2d 294 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1960)
Ex Parte Patterson
993 S.W.2d 114 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1999)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lyle, George Randall, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lyle-george-randall-texcrimapp-2015.