Lyerly v. . Wheeler

34 N.C. 290
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided August 5, 1851·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

*291 Pearson, J.

The lessor claimed title under a sheriff’s sale and deed. The demise was on the 6th of November 1848. The deed was dated on the same day.

The defendant contended, that the date of the deed was no evidence that it was executed on that day, and the plaintiff could not recover without proving, that it was executed on the day it bore date.

The Court charged, that the date of the deed was prima facie evidence of the time of its execution. To this, the defendant excepts; which is the only point made in the case.

There is no error. The date of the deed or other writing is prima facie evidence of theiime of its execution, upon the general principle, that the acts of every person, in transacting business, are presumed to f^ggJ^fesjfSj^ith truth, in the absence of any motive for

Per Curiam. fut1* kmed. LIBEAEf.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lyerly v. . Wheeler, 34 N.C. 290 (N.C. 1851).

34 N.C. 290 (Lyerly v. . Wheeler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Monteith v. Welch
94 S.E.2d 345 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1956)
Turlington v. . Neighbors
24 S.E.2d 648 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1943)
Green v. . Casualty Co.
167 S.E. 38 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1932)
Green v. Inter-Ocean Casualty Co.
203 N.C. 767 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1932)
Belk Ex Rel. Belk v. Belk
94 S.E. 726 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1917)
Kendrick v. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance
32 S.E. 728 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1899)
Kendrick v. . Dellinger
23 S.E. 438 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1895)