Lydick v. State Banking Board

11 S.W.2d 505, 118 Tex. 168, 1929 Tex. LEXIS 143
Texas Supreme Court·Decided January 23, 1929·No. No. 5016.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

Mr. Presiding Judge HARVEY

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.

The Supreme Court has this day adopted the opinion of Section B of the Commission, in the case of Edwin Lacy, et al. v. State Banking Board. The holdings in that opinion require the same disposition of this case that is made of that case.

We recommend that the mandamus sought herein be refused.

Opinion of the Commission of Appeals adopted, and mandamus refused.

Thos. B. Greenwood, Associate Justice.

William Pierson, Associate Justice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lydick v. State Banking Board, 11 S.W.2d 505, 118 Tex. 168, 1929 Tex. LEXIS 143 (Tex. 1929).

11 S.W.2d 505 (Lydick v. State Banking Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Sharpe v. Smith
234 N.W. 764 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1931)
Smythe v. Cochran
14 S.W.2d 821 (Texas Supreme Court, 1929)