Home/Texas Supreme Court/Lydick v. State Banking Board

Lydick v. State Banking Board

11 S.W.2d 505, 118 Tex. 168, 1929 Tex. LEXIS 143
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 23, 1929
DocketNo. 5016.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 11 S.W.2d 505 (Lydick v. State Banking Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lydick v. State Banking Board, 11 S.W.2d 505, 118 Tex. 168, 1929 Tex. LEXIS 143 (Tex. 1929).

Opinions

Mr. Presiding Judge HARVEY

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.

The Supreme Court has this day adopted the opinion of Section B of the Commission, in the case of Edwin Lacy, et al. v. State Banking Board. The holdings in that opinion require the same disposition of this case that is made of that case.

We recommend that the mandamus sought herein be refused.

Opinion of the Commission of Appeals adopted, and mandamus refused.

Thos. B. Greenwood, Associate Justice.

William Pierson, Associate Justice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Sharpe v. Smith
234 N.W. 764 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1931)
Smythe v. Cochran
14 S.W.2d 821 (Texas Supreme Court, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 S.W.2d 505, 118 Tex. 168, 1929 Tex. LEXIS 143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lydick-v-state-banking-board-tex-1929.