Lydem v. DePiera
This text of 147 So. 2d 573 (Lydem v. DePiera) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant, plaintiff in the trial court, seeks review of a final judgment rendered in favor of the defendant following a non-jury trial.
[574]*574Unfortunately, the trial proceedings were not transcribed and the record has not been perfected in accordance with the principles announced in Potash v. Dry & Company, 8 Fla.Supp. 174, which procedure was cited with approval by this court in Moyer v. Moyer, Fla.App.1959, 114 So.2d 638.
Therefore, not having the evidence before us that was taken in the trial court, we have no alternative but to affirm the final judgment. See: Hall v. Davis, Fla.App. 1958, 106 So.2d 599.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
147 So. 2d 573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lydem-v-depiera-fladistctapp-1962.