Lyda v. Murray
This text of Lyda v. Murray (Lyda v. Murray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA LACY JANE LYDA, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 25-CIV-261-RAW ) TAMMY MURRAY, et al., ) ) ) ) ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER Before the court is the Findings and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Magistrate Judge Robertson, reviewing the complaint of the pro se plaintiff, found that it was inadequate and should be dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff filed an objection, but has also filed an amended complaint (#13). An amended complaint supersedes a prior complaint and renders it of no legal effect. Tufaro v. Okla. ex rel. Bd. of Regents of the Univ. of Okla., 107 F.4th 1121, 1137 (10th Cir.2024). It is the order of the court that the Findings and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (#9) is deemed moot.
ORDERED THIS 19th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025.
______________________________________ RONALD A. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lyda v. Murray, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lyda-v-murray-oked-2025.