Lyczak v. Margulies
162 A. 590, 109 N.J.L. 352, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 356
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion filed in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Tren chard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Brogan, Van Buskirk, Kays, Dear, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lyczak v. Margulies, 162 A. 590, 109 N.J.L. 352, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 356 (N.J. 1932).
162 A. 590 (Lyczak v. Margulies) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.