Luzalbert Hernandez v. State
This text of Luzalbert Hernandez v. State (Luzalbert Hernandez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-20-00216-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
LUZALBERT HERNANDEZ A/K/A LUZ ALBERT HERNANDEZ, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
On appeal from the 377th District Court of Victoria County, Texas.
ORDER OF ABATEMENT Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Perkes Order Per Curiam
This cause is now before the court on appellant’s motion to stay and motion for
extension of time. Appellant asserts the trial court has not ruled on a pending motion for
indigency hearing and pauper’s oath. The trial clerk’s record filed with this court reflects a motion for indigency hearing
was filed with the trial court on May 13, 2020, and the State’s response was filed on May
29, 2020. A reporter’s record has not been filed, and it is unknown whether the appellate
record should be furnished without charge.
Pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 20.2, the motion to stay is hereby GRANTED. The
appeal is ABATED and the cause REMANDED to the trial court for further proceedings.
Upon remand, the trial court shall cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter,
conduct a hearing to determine the following:
1. Whether appellant is indigent;
2. Whether appellant is entitled to a free appellate record due to indigency; and,
3. Whether appellant is entitled to appointed counsel.
If the trial court determines appellant is indigent and entitled to court-appointed
counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent appellant in this appeal. If
counsel is appointed, the name, address, telephone number, email address, and state
bar number of the appointed counsel shall be included in the order of appointment.
The trial court shall cause its findings and recommendations, together with any
relevant orders it may enter, to be included in a supplemental clerk's record and shall
cause a supplemental reporter's record of any proceedings to be prepared. The
supplemental clerk's record and supplemental reporter's record, if any, shall be filed with
the Clerk of this Court on or before the expiration of thirty days from the date of this order.
Furthermore, appellant’s motion for extension of time is DISMISSED AS MOOT.
The briefing schedule will resume upon the filing of the clerk’s supplemental record. It is so ORDERED.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed the 17th day of November, 2020.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Luzalbert Hernandez v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/luzalbert-hernandez-v-state-texapp-2020.