Luz Acosta Diaz v. Carlos Subia
446 F.2d 882
This text of 446 F.2d 882 (Luz Acosta Diaz v. Carlos Subia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Luz Acosta Diaz v. Carlos Subia, 446 F.2d 882 (5th Cir. 1971).
Opinion
The order of the District Court dismissing plaintiffs’ third amended complaint is affirmed. We agree with the District Court that plaintiffs failed to set out “a short and plain statement of the claim” as required by Rule 8(a), Fed. R.Civ.P. We do not reach other grounds asserted as basis for the dismissal which is, of course, without prejudice.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, Defendant-Third Party v. Marine Mart, Inc., Third Party
431 F.2d 409 (Third Circuit, 1970)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
446 F.2d 882, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/luz-acosta-diaz-v-carlos-subia-ca5-1971.