Luxurious X v. Vincent

Fourth Circuit

Luxurious X v. Vincent

96 F. App'x 865

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 4, 2004·No. No. 03-7935·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Luxurious X appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Luxurious X v. Vincent, No. CA-01-4419-6 (D.S.C. Aug. 22, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Luxurious X appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Luxurious X v. Vincent, No. CA-01-4419-6 (D.S.C. Aug. 22, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Luxurious X v. Vincent, 96 F. App'x 865 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

96 F. App'x 865 (Luxurious X v. Vincent) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related