Lutz v. Spokane Regional Health District

District Court, E.D. Washington·Decided April 29, 2022·No. 2:22-cv-00028·Unknown

Opinion

1 FILED IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 2 Apr 29, 2022 3 SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 7 ROBERT B. LUTZ, MD, MPH, a No. 2:22-CV-00028-MKD married man, 8 PROTECTIVE ORDER Plaintiff, 9 v. ECF No. 9-1

10 SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT and AMELIA CLARK, an 11 individual,

12 Defendants.

13 Before the Court is the parties’ proposed protective order, ECF No. 9-1. A 14 district court may issue protective orders regarding discovery upon a showing of 15 good cause. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c); Phillips ex rel. Ests. of Byrd v. Gen. Motors 16 Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210 (9th Cir. 2002). 17 The Court has reviewed the proposed protective order, the record, and is 18 fully informed. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), the Court finds 19 good cause to issue the parties’ stipulated protective order, ECF No. 9-1. 20 Accordingly, the parties shall abide by the following protective order: 1 PROTECTIVE ORDER 2 1. Purposes and Limitations

3 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential or 4 private personal information of the Parties (and third parties) for which special 5 protection may be warranted. Accordingly, the Parties petition the Court to enter

6 the following Protective Order, which shall apply to all discovery in this action, 7 including third-party discovery. The Parties acknowledge that this agreement does 8 not confer blanket protection on all disclosures or responses to discovery, the 9 protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited

10 information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable 11 legal principles, and it does not presumptively entitle the Parties to file confidential 12 information under seal.

13 2. “Confidential” Material 14 Confidential material may be designated “CONFIDENTIAL.” 15 The following documents and tangible things produced or otherwise 16 exchanged may be designated “CONFIDENTIAL”:

17 1. Documents containing an individual’s financial information; 18 2. Documents subject to contractual confidentiality provisions; 19 3. Documents containing personally identifiable information

20 (“PII”) pertaining to any individuals. 1 3. Scope 2 The protections conferred by this agreement cover not only confidential

3 material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from 4 confidential material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of 5 confidential material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations by

6 Parties or their counsel that might reveal confidential material. 7 However, the protections conferred by this agreement do not cover 8 information that the designating Party placed within the public domain or becomes 9 part of the public domain through trial or otherwise unless inadvertently placed.

10 The procedure for which is set forth in Section 8. 11 4. Access To and Use of Confidential Material 12 4.1 Basic Principles.

13 A receiving party may use confidential material disclosed or produced 14 by another party or by a non-party in connection with this case and that has 15 been designated “CONFIDENTIAL” only for prosecuting, defending, or 16 attempting to settle this litigation. Confidential material may be disclosed

17 only to the categories of persons and under the conditions described in this 18 Protective Order. Confidential material must be stored and maintained by a 19 receiving party at a location and in a secure manner that ensures that access

20 is limited to the persons authorized under this Protective Order. 1 4.2 Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. 2 Unless otherwise ordered by the Court or permitted in writing by the

3 designating party, a receiving party may disclose any material designated 4 “CONFIDENTIAL” only to: 5 a. the Parties to this action;

6 b. the receiving party’s outside counsel of record in this 7 action, as well as employees of such counsel to whom it 8 is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for 9 this litigation;

10 c. experts and consultants to whom disclosure is reasonably 11 necessary for this litigation and who have signed the 12 “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound”

13 (Exhibit A); 14 d. the Court, court personnel, and court reporters and their 15 staff; 16 e. copy, document management, electronic discovery, or

17 imaging service providers retained by counsel to assist in 18 the management and duplication of confidential material, 19 provided that such service provider has agreed in writing

20 to use any confidential material only to perform services 1 for the party that has retained it in this litigation, not to 2 disclose any confidential material to third parties and to

3 immediately return all originals and copies of any 4 confidential material upon completion of the service; 5 f. during their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom

6 disclosure is reasonably necessary and who have signed 7 the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” 8 (Exhibit A), unless otherwise agreed by the designating 9 party or ordered by the Court;

10 g. the author or recipient of a document containing the 11 information or a custodian or other person who otherwise 12 possessed or knew the information.

13 h. mock trial and jury consultants, including, but not limited 14 to, mock jurors who have signed the “Acknowledgment 15 and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A); and 16 i. any mediator retained by the Parties or appointed by the

17 Court in this action and employees of such mediator who 18 are assisting in the conduct of the mediation, provided 19 that such mediator has agreed to maintain the

20 1 confidentiality of confidential information received in 2 this action.

3 4.3 Filing Confidential Material. 4 Before filing confidential material or discussing or referencing such 5 material in court filings, the filing party shall confer with the designating

6 party to determine whether the designating party will remove the 7 confidential designation, whether the document can be redacted, or whether 8 a motion to seal or stipulation and proposed order is warranted. 9 5. Designating Confidential Material

10 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. 11 Each party or non-party that designates information or items for 12 protection under this Protective Order must take care to limit any such 13 designation to specific material that qualifies pursuant to Section 2. The 14 designation may be applied to the entirety of a document. However, upon 15 reasonable request of the opposing party, the producing party must provide a 16 more narrowly designated version of a document previously designated in its 17 entirety, designating for protection only those parts of material, documents, 18 items, or oral or written communications that qualify for protection. 19 Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations and mass, 20 indiscriminate, or routinized requests for narrower designations of 1 documents designated in their entirety are prohibited. Designations that are 2 shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper

3 purpose (e.g., to unnecessarily encumber or delay the case development 4 process or to impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties) 5 may expose the designating party to sanctions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lutz v. Spokane Regional Health District, (E.D. Wash. 2022).

Lutz v. Spokane Regional Health District (Lutz v. Spokane Regional Health District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Phillips v. General Motors Corporation
307 F.3d 1206 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)