Lutz v. City of Philadelphia
101 A.3d 782
Opinion
[783] ORDER
AND NOW, this 1st day of October, 2014, the Petition for Allowance' of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioner, are:
(1) Whether the Commonwealth Court’s order allowing a panel of arbitrators to address an issue never raised in the underlying interest arbitration proceedings is contrary to decades of authority from courts of this Commonwealth limiting the authority of arbitrators to address only those issues timely and properly placed before them?
(2) Whether the Commonwealth Court’s order allowing a panel of arbitrators to address an issue never raised in the underlying interest arbitration proceedings is contrary to decades of authority from courts of this Commonwealth stating that decisions of Act 111 arbitrators are to be rendered swiftly and with finality?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lutz v. City of Philadelphia, 101 A.3d 782 (Pa. 2014).
101 A.3d 782 (Lutz v. City of Philadelphia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Michael G. Lutz Lodge No. 5, of the Fraternal Order of Police v. City of Philadelphia
129 A.3d 1221 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2015)