Lutz v. Bankers Fire Insurance

Nebraska Supreme Court

Lutz v. Bankers Fire Insurance

189 N.W. 161, 108 Neb. 760, 1922 Neb. LEXIS 305

Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided June 12, 1922·No. No. 22014·Published

Opinion

Day, District Judge.

This case is similar to the preceding case of Ehlers v. Bankers Fire Ins. Co., ante, p. 756. Both cases were argued together, and all the propositions involved in this case were decided in that case. The trial court-probably overlooked requiring the plaintiff to return the certificate for 100 shares of stock of the Bankers Fire Insurance Company. The plaintiff should be required to do this, and the decree is modified in this regard.

Affirmed as modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Day, District Judge.

This case is similar to the preceding case of Ehlers v. Bankers Fire Ins. Co., ante, p. 756. Both cases were argued together, and all the propositions involved in this case were decided in that case. The trial court-probably overlooked requiring the plaintiff to return the certificate for 100 shares of stock of the Bankers Fire Insurance Company. The plaintiff should be required to do this, and the decree is modified in this regard.

Affirmed as modified.

Lutz v. Bankers Fire Insurance, 189 N.W. 161, 108 Neb. 760, 1922 Neb. LEXIS 305 (Neb. 1922).

Pincite

189 N.W. 161 (Lutz v. Bankers Fire Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.