Lutynski v. B. B. & J. Trucking, Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Lutynski v. B. B. & J. Trucking, Inc.

632 A.2d 692, 227 Conn. 914, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 323

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided September 15, 1993·No. SC 14822·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 31 Conn. App. 806 (AC 11300), is granted, limited to the following issue:

[915]*915The Supreme Court docket number is SC 14822. Decided September 15, 1993 James E. Kernan, in support of the petition. James A. Mulhall, Jr., in opposition.

“Under the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court was required by General Statutes § 52-192a, the offer of judgment statute, to award prejudgment interest?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 31 Conn. App. 806 (AC 11300), is granted, limited to the following issue:

[915]*915The Supreme Court docket number is SC 14822. Decided September 15, 1993 James E. Kernan, in support of the petition. James A. Mulhall, Jr., in opposition.

“Under the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court was required by General Statutes § 52-192a, the offer of judgment statute, to award prejudgment interest?”

Lutynski v. B. B. & J. Trucking, Inc., 632 A.2d 692, 227 Conn. 914, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 323 (Colo. 1993).

Pincite

632 A.2d 692 (Lutynski v. B. B. & J. Trucking, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related