Luttrell v. State

119 So. 396, 96 Fla. 551
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedNovember 1, 1928
StatusPublished

This text of 119 So. 396 (Luttrell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Luttrell v. State, 119 So. 396, 96 Fla. 551 (Fla. 1928).

Opinion

Ellis, C. J.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of assault with intent to commit robbery upon information filed against him in the Criminal Court of Record of Palm Beach County by the county solicitor. Robbery is not a capital felony.

It is contended that a person may not under the Constitution of Florida be tried for a felony except upon an indictment by the grand jury. The question has been settled by the Court contrary to the contention of plaintiff in error. See Sawyer v. State, 94 Fla., 60, 113 So. R. 736.

Affirmed.

Strum and Brown, J. J., concur. Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sawyer v. State of Florida
113 So. 726 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
119 So. 396, 96 Fla. 551, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/luttrell-v-state-fla-1928.