Luttrell v. . Martin

16 S.E. 325, 111 N.C. 528
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 5, 1892·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Burwell, J.:

It is settled that no appeal lies from a refusal to dismiss an action. Plemmons v. Improvement Co., 108 N. C., 614. Nor does an appeal lie from an interlocutory order adjudging that the defendants have been duly served with process and are properly before the Court. Guilford County v. Georgia Company, 109 N. C., 310.

The appeal in this case is premature, and must be dismissed. It is so ordered. Appeal Dismissed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luttrell v. . Martin, 16 S.E. 325, 111 N.C. 528 (N.C. 1892).

16 S.E. 325 (Luttrell v. . Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. Bailey
177 N.C. 37 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1919)
Luttrell v. . Martin
17 S.E. 573 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1893)