Luttrell v. . Martin

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Luttrell v. . Martin

16 S.E. 325, 111 N.C. 528

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedSeptember 5, 1892

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 16 S.E. 325 (Luttrell v. . Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Luttrell v. . Martin, 16 S.E. 325, 111 N.C. 528 (N.C. 1892).

Pincite

Opinion

Burwell, J.:

It is settled that no appeal lies from a refusal to dismiss an action. Plemmons v. Improvement Co., 108 N. C., 614. Nor does an appeal lie from an interlocutory order adjudging that the defendants have been duly served with process and are properly before the Court. Guilford County v. Georgia Company, 109 N. C., 310.

The appeal in this case is premature, and must be dismissed. It is so ordered. Appeal Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burwell, J.:

It is settled that no appeal lies from a refusal to dismiss an action. Plemmons v. Improvement Co., 108 N. C., 614. Nor does an appeal lie from an interlocutory order adjudging that the defendants have been duly served with process and are properly before the Court. Guilford County v. Georgia Company, 109 N. C., 310.

The appeal in this case is premature, and must be dismissed. It is so ordered. Appeal Dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 S.E. 325, 111 N.C. 528, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/luttrell-v-martin-nc-1892.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack