Luttrell v. Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles

Supreme Court of Florida

Luttrell v. Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles

12 So. 3d 198, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 374, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 974, 2009 WL 1617765

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedJune 11, 2009

DocketSC08-1396

StatusPublished

This text of 12 So. 3d 198 (Luttrell v. Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Luttrell v. Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, 12 So. 3d 198, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 374, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 974, 2009 WL 1617765 (Fla. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the Fifth District Court of Appeal in Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles v. Luttrell, 983 So.2d 1215 (Fla. 5th DCA), review granted, 1 So.3d 172 (Fla.2008) (table), based on express and direct conflict with the decision of this Court in Brannen v. State, 94 Fla. 656, 114 So. 429 (1927). See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. After further, full consideration, we have determined that we should exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, this review proceeding is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

QUINCE, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, CANADY, POLSTON, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the Fifth District Court of Appeal in Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles v. Luttrell, 983 So.2d 1215 (Fla. 5th DCA), review granted, 1 So.3d 172 (Fla.2008) (table), based on express and direct conflict with the decision of this Court in Brannen v. State, 94 Fla. 656, 114 So. 429 (1927). See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. After further, full consideration, we have determined that we should exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, this review proceeding is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

QUINCE, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, CANADY, POLSTON, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 So. 3d 198, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 374, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 974, 2009 WL 1617765, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/luttrell-v-florida-department-of-highway-safety-and-motor-vehicles-fla-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack