Lutter v. Neubauer
127 A. 924, 101 N.J.L. 222, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 212
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the ppinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenehard in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Min-turn, Black, Katzenbach, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskiric, Clark, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lutter v. Neubauer, 127 A. 924, 101 N.J.L. 222, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 212 (N.J. 1925).
127 A. 924 (Lutter v. Neubauer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cornwell v. Cornwell
118 F.2d 396 (D.C. Circuit, 1941)
Paterson Stove Repair Co. v. Ritzer
8 A.2d 133 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1939)