Luton v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Luton v. State

874 S.W.2d 562, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 730, 1994 WL 160380

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 3, 1994·No. No. 64790·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the motion court’s denial of her Rule 24.035 motion alleging her motion counsel’s failure to file an amended motion and request an evidentiary hearing constituted an abandonment under Luleff v. State, 807 S.W.2d 495 (Mo. banc 1991). We affirm. We find the motion court’s findings of fact are not clearly erroneous and no error of law appears. Rule 84.16(b)(2) and (5).

We further find an opinion in this case would have no precedential value and affirm by written order. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum has been issued to the parties for their use only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the motion court’s denial of her Rule 24.035 motion alleging her motion counsel’s failure to file an amended motion and request an evidentiary hearing constituted an abandonment under Luleff v. State, 807 S.W.2d 495 (Mo. banc 1991). We affirm. We find the motion court’s findings of fact are not clearly erroneous and no error of law appears. Rule 84.16(b)(2) and (5).

We further find an opinion in this case would have no precedential value and affirm by written order. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum has been issued to the parties for their use only.

Luton v. State, 874 S.W.2d 562, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 730, 1994 WL 160380 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

874 S.W.2d 562 (Luton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related