Luther W. Cobb, Sr. v. Marilene F. Cobb

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 27, 2015
Docket03-14-00325-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Luther W. Cobb, Sr. v. Marilene F. Cobb (Luther W. Cobb, Sr. v. Marilene F. Cobb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Luther W. Cobb, Sr. v. Marilene F. Cobb, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

January 27, 2015

CGOfU OF /\PPe/VlS AJUA\?)£R, O3-rt-O03A5-Gv/ CTM4L CouR.1 CAS£ /UU/n&fcft. Afe»-afe3-0) XM TH£ COUR.1 OF APPEALS FOR. THt STAlfc OF 1£MS (TW\r<} Wferv\£ 3uc)\

V

Aope<;W Prom tU 5i<\^ 3oclie.K\ fcisAneV rr Cour-\ of fee\\ £000^ j le**S APPtiJ-AAn's foRXer

3X&H FAt 9l05«1

^^ 72815 List dp F/Wnes

Gre/xovj K£\Ua Simmons biSfnet Clerk liHJAioHU H^SVre4 fcUee»-\,7X -|65G 4 F/^ J. 054 Tennessee Colony TV\£ UoAocc^bU

tV\£ HoAor^Me A\qi4Uj Coor+Uou3e P.O. Box -j*n fcetton T> 15513 TA&Lt OF Qo/OT^l^ PA 6GS TTE/v\S

idieaiiVv op P^ies <^d Counsel \

TsVAe of (LoaWVs }\ Index. oT- AuiUoriVieS 'W S\q\e^\enV oP ^Ke e^vS€ * Lssues Presented 2. S^VemeoV of 4V»et 3,Ll6 ?>omm oP-VU^. Awme>aV &{\A

it UUteX o? /\0THoftlTl£S

(LAS6S 3*wVe eA5e ?/\&&S ftV\AUeZ v Housing AoiU.of (fL pAJo Ml5.Wi0«f503 ** Ckern£ Tr\du3j InS V/^s\\w3 iCS $,b,giJl6h

Po2>e|»er 5&5,

Ia re ?.L,i. ias s.us&l it^ia, Cm zoo^ n Le^l v 0il*j of ftasenbm 11 £^.3^3 86 'I (lei, Aof>, AwciUo £ooa} LifMOooJ V MHAJfe 1&, 6oci Cie*M* »» KQmoo3 i> Riewdic/^ aas- «fcw, 3c-/ 67i (re?, /ssa *a vieicerv v eowm\5Sn,n fw^ Ly^^r Proline w Pel* demise*

tO^Vrn^t- v 6lrt33 13.5 S,W»3 ^65/ (*7Y»# 4tfc>sl) '*»

HtfuHu^ V LrteiC 4J1 0>3%U(>iZl(> I* 108- S.fl.. ^57S | Jol MhjicJl&HSOrtt ~r/3 ciVii procedure faid an /c>, 11,13, IV Rule 3ot 10 J2. ft/le *S£ *!/ /

fi«/ie- 46,l60> Ti 1/ 13,1 «f »a ij B, IH ,tf ^i/le Mo ^c/m/ V

Ilk VTATEMeAn of iue £as£

On ^}£Jienr\V)er \%^ 3.o\o. fKe Origins! PefiV\ovn For ftiv- Oree Ce^-I~5 -Vhrou^h f) u<\*> Piled, ^om^od^ Mused s Alo\to»n To Reeuse Vobe PtlecJ^e Ke^rmc happened on "3uij H, Aoii Ce^-I-31^ Honorable ^odc^ fcielc Atoms presided over fKe progeedi'K on "3oluy*V Signed-H\e FirKi beeree op Dworce CC^-i-St mrou^K ^^c Appe)kA\- P\\ed q premat ure ''ReaoesV for Fi^dmc oP FAeV *aJ ^OAeluSian oy> Uu " CCR-I-tf\ +Wro^h 61} °OA I3L-3-IS, AppeU^ P>\ecf <; +\me\>/ "Atofree oP PasV Due Fi*dme oP-1 F^eV q^J in clusion of1 Uhj C CR,-I-\01 VkftfUch \0%} on /YWeh n,ao!<-| ^xtencJioc Qppelkfe +Irnei*V>\e vo Pi\e AJottee oP Appeal k> A14-| \a^Kj AoiA. AppellQAt- Piled ^ timely note oP Appeal CC^I- UO A^13 , loiq 5»vinc \^\\$ tourf J^rfad fe Hon issues ? Re seated

I. Did Appe\knVs premq\ure\y Piledt Ru\e A%*'Kequesi for Findmc op Fnei Qnd Conclusion oP L/Ho" Followed ^ \\rv\e\i Piled ^C3-\>Wj "AJote oP pnsi Due (Wins oP F^et ^/ Conclusion oP Lau" expend deadline wi+U»n U)K\eK 4o perPeei- QppeO +o ^0 clnys QPter FiaqI Dceree op Divoree ions Signed ^-i?-H qUoomc +tmely C5-13-I4 AJo+\>e oP Appeal a. Did ^ric;\ Court abuse fVs di$<*re+\on bv P«i\ii£to Pile "Fiodine oF F/^d Qnd Conclusion oP U*u/'"ions Piled co\VK eleVK 3 Gfvose number ifc^a&S-t) is void because Afpe\\ee'S trfcl Counsel eom^niV drnPV\nv: treve ta\| dfftfhat fV>e Rr\*l beeree oP tV\vor

5 GAuse A)u»\ber 861,263-D ft \W 'beftMte n^ Pmdw^crP /Vbihty k p*^ Child i-Jpjoc?rh 6.APpeilcnV dmeJ fteeesS k> four}- b^ rvoh ctttftomj k>be ptsje/it by Phone

1 e/yuse number 2£i, a63~D vmJ PooAot-m^ms. (WwA oP tub*vF

%0ftOS€ numW atl, 463-D V/crfd Fbr nop m^kvns PWmS o^ tohere 4V Aio*n>y ,!5

* SIAieA^ATr op fa err ^

X?>sue Or^e, in *H\e. clerk's ReeorJ CaQ is> qa f\?P\^- ViV ooc ° (CR-X-13 iVau^ i»y u)Hl\ia itase doeo/^enis Appe^QnV ^uoKed qppelUfe jurisdiction low reve<;\m<; hi3 P\nq^^vq\ SUtos \\ SiMemV/i\-a under penqlty aP perjury \>| ^P^essinc no 3ouree OP ineo^e Qad no flaoAey on K^d CCfc-X- 14 q*\J 153.Appellant expressed Ke tad no "^oney \o pwJe i> pre nature loop FtmeW \)erbM -tKe Finql Deeree oP bivo- fee Ukich UMs Piled QnJ SiWd A-I«-IH CCft-X-K Hvroixh %)>j\ Seeor\Jl4Findin« op F*er Q^d Conclusion oP La\i App^lUnt plqcinc \\ in ^ AWKqel Unites Out^oin^ pruon P^ntlboxl The ~A1\ch*el Onips Zntern^l AiAiTinj: sysk^ hn$ up \o {too LoorKioc cUyS io process Ou^olnc / ineonnioc mnil^e^ loje Second "Find- iinc op ^Fqet ^^J ^Conclusion opt/no'' reeewed law ^e Aietael UniVi Internal Aniline XNMe"\ on 3-10-14 (See gx^tiVsAOQndt^but^ CoSrV 'Piled ft 3-IVI4 C^I' ^ grouch \5feii A"AJoftee OP Pnst bue Finding op Ket QaJ Conclusion oP LauT'Oas Piled 3-W14 u>^en Appe llant plnced it io tUe yHieMel OniV's oukofnc prison mail box drxd, the MieKnel UniV^ Internal AW\li<\X or u\\m M\e^e\ (Jnips XnVern^l Alqilinc s^S^e^ '°55ed +l^is ^3 bevnc reeeiueer 5-i3-H Csee exUbit^J buV VUe Court Piled tUis ./UoViee oP Appeql 5-im C^-I^liOibuV VUe dleqdline fo Pile AJohee oP Apped U)^3 5-\MM. l

3 Issue Two, Appe\kAVs first "Request For F\Vj»n$ Of

Unit's outcjomc prison VnW\boX'TW\s m^cie it premsture but TWeVJ WVok Ue F\ncv\ beeree oP Divorce CoKieh tops Piled <;nd '^KAed J-|fr-i«j CCR.-I-86 FnroocK 1 AppVlknt p^eio^ >V ^ T*e /%Ue! Units £uW>in<: pHsb^ mrtUb&^.TkJs ^Ade it wiV^n The.Twe<\Ff d*y flme iWt k> request"FvnamcoP FAet tnJ eoAcMioiA o^> Law," sHrtiAf Fro^n H>e 9^- \%--m FmcrDeeree oP Oivo toorlCin$ d*>p 1© protf&S OuV/goW / ineoiin^ irmil, ikes lo«ecTH»e Seeonrd "Findinc oV FAtt <^d Contoi'on op ' Uty" „ reeeiued b>j tne AhehWel Unit's Ir\; _ Tern/*! Al Ailing intern or\ 3-lo-H ('see £xtaVfS-tyWA. ) but +Ue Couo|- PiWd it 3->S-l4 Ceft-I-^HUroAh 106), \We e\e<*Kv £oont QaJ Appellee over looked &*• prem<;iure\y Filed ReQueSt For FiQinC oP FAet ^nd Condition oP Uu'CCfc-X-S*) wo- uch 6~6 bA 03ed +ke eot>f+i Fi\e JaK oP 3-13-H wWeK L>nS ^ SeeonJ "fteauest For RndwcoP F<\et ^nd (?one|u3ioo of- LaO Qnd S4id"TK.S cWu/nent u;W PiWd on nweh i3^,4«>H/ TWi?> UjaS. We^Vf-tWee cUw3 q(He<* -H\& \udwent um3 Si^nec/ C£(*.-£-lo<0»The 3-&-H file Bnte co^s use ^uSViPieAti^o Act Vo Conduct Findinc oP FAet Qnd (?one|u5io/i oP Lao b^ \Ut eoorf- Qnd Appellee. CiHWin So dn>p CiH&-i*0 ^PV +Ae fi^sv pre- M^ureW P»\ed ReQunt for FmdkoP FAdt W epnel«>Ji

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Luther W. Cobb, Sr. v. Marilene F. Cobb, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/luther-w-cobb-sr-v-marilene-f-cobb-texapp-2015.