Luther v. Nason
74 N.E. 1128, 36 Ind. App. 702, 1905 Ind. App. LEXIS 243
This text of 74 N.E. 1128 (Luther v. Nason) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Luther v. Nason, 74 N.E. 1128, 36 Ind. App. 702, 1905 Ind. App. LEXIS 243 (Ind. Ct. App. 1905).
Opinion
The question whether the finding of the court was sustained by sufficient evidence or was contrary to law being alone presented, we have carefully considered the evidence in the record and have concluded that the trial court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
74 N.E. 1128, 36 Ind. App. 702, 1905 Ind. App. LEXIS 243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/luther-v-nason-indctapp-1905.