Luther v. Morris
This text of 688 N.W.2d 282 (Luther v. Morris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Sarah J. LUTHER, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Jamie M. MORRIS and Michael Morris, Defendants-Appellants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 5, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the Court of Appeals judgment and we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of this Court's decision in Kreiner v. Fischer, and Straub v. Collette, 471 Mich. 109, 683 N.W.2d 611 (2004).
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH, J., would grant leave to appeal.
*283 WEAVER, J., dissents and states as follows:
I would grant leave to appeal. I would reconsider Kreiner v. Fischer, 471 Mich. 109, 683 N.W.2d 611 (2004), for the reasons stated in the Kreiner dissenting opinion.
MARILYN J. KELLY, J., joins in the statement of WEAVER, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
688 N.W.2d 282, 471 Mich. 908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/luther-v-morris-mich-2004.