Luther v. Locke

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1297

WILLIAM LUTHER,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

GARY LOCKE,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:09-cv-00748-LMB-IDD)

Submitted: August 19, 2010 Decided: August 26, 2010

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Luther, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Holland Hambrick, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

William Luther appeals the district court’s order

granting the Defendant’s motion to dismiss his civil action. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Luther v. Locke, No. 1:09-cv-00748-LMB-IDD (E.D. Va.

Jan. 11, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED