Luther v. Deyo
This text of 19 Wend. 629 (Luther v. Deyo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Chief Justice took the papers for consideration, and at a subsequent day, directed a rule to be entered that the defendant be discharged from custody. No formal opinion was delivered.
Motion granted.
During this term, the same question arose upon a similar application to be discharged from custody on a ca. sa„ issued in the cause of Stewart v. Kilt-mar, which was an action of replevin, on the ground of an insolven^discharge, granted under the article of the statute regulating voluntary assignments by an insolvent for the purpose of exonerating his person from imprisonment, and the same disposition made of it; the Chief Justice ordering the defendant to be released from custody. A similar order was made by Mr. Justice Bronson, upon a like discharge exonerating the person of the insolvent from imprison, ment, in December 1836, in the case of Clapper v. Betts, which was an action of trespass,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
19 Wend. 629, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/luther-v-deyo-nysupct-1839.