Luther B. Jackson v. Terry Hensley

484 F.2d 992, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 7994
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 7, 1973
Docket73-2084
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 484 F.2d 992 (Luther B. Jackson v. Terry Hensley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Luther B. Jackson v. Terry Hensley, 484 F.2d 992, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 7994 (5th Cir. 1973).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

It is hereby ordered that the above styled and numbered appeal be dismissed for want of prosecution in view of the appellant’s failure to file a brief within the time fixed by the rules. 1 Rule 9(b). See Tidwell v. Dees, 5th Cir. 1972, 464 F.2d 1297.

1

. It is appropriate to dispose of this pro se case summarily, pursuant to this Court’s Local Rule 9(c)(2), appellant having failed to file a brief within the time fixed by Rule 31, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Kimbrough v. Beto, Director, 5th Cir. 1969, 412 F.2d 981.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In The Matter Of Braniff Airways, Inc.
774 F.2d 1303 (Fifth Circuit, 1985)
FIRST NAT. BANK OF AMARILLO v. Martin
48 B.R. 317 (N.D. Texas, 1985)
In re Har-Dway House Statuary, Inc.
76 F.R.D. 204 (E.D. Missouri, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
484 F.2d 992, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 7994, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/luther-b-jackson-v-terry-hensley-ca5-1973.