Luther B. Jackson v. Terry Hensley

Fifth Circuit

Luther B. Jackson v. Terry Hensley

484 F.2d 992, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 7994

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided September 7, 1973·No. 73-2084·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

It is hereby ordered that the above styled and numbered appeal be dismissed for want of prosecution in view of the appellant’s failure to file a brief within the time fixed by the rules. 1 Rule 9(b). See Tidwell v. Dees, 5th Cir. 1972, 464 F.2d 1297.

1

. It is appropriate to dispose of this pro se case summarily, pursuant to this Court’s Local Rule 9(c)(2), appellant having failed to file a brief within the time fixed by Rule 31, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Kimbrough v. Beto, Director, 5th Cir. 1969, 412 F.2d 981.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

It is hereby ordered that the above styled and numbered appeal be dismissed for want of prosecution in view of the appellant’s failure to file a brief within the time fixed by the rules. 1 Rule 9(b). See Tidwell v. Dees, 5th Cir. 1972, 464 F.2d 1297.

1

. It is appropriate to dispose of this pro se case summarily, pursuant to this Court’s Local Rule 9(c)(2), appellant having failed to file a brief within the time fixed by Rule 31, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Kimbrough v. Beto, Director, 5th Cir. 1969, 412 F.2d 981.

Luther B. Jackson v. Terry Hensley, 484 F.2d 992, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 7994 (5th Cir. 1973).

Pincite

484 F.2d 992 (Luther B. Jackson v. Terry Hensley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related