Lutes v. Treasurer of Missouri

Missouri Court of Appeals

Lutes v. Treasurer of Missouri

489 S.W.3d 332, 2016 WL 2731940, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 469

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 10, 2016·No. No. ED 103488·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James Lutes appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“Commission”) denying his claim for permanent partial and/or total disability benefits from the Second Injury Fund. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The decision of the Commission is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James Lutes appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“Commission”) denying his claim for permanent partial and/or total disability benefits from the Second Injury Fund. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The decision of the Commission is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Lutes v. Treasurer of Missouri, 489 S.W.3d 332, 2016 WL 2731940, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 469 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

489 S.W.3d 332 (Lutes v. Treasurer of Missouri) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.