Lutes v. Treasurer of Missouri

Missouri Court of Appeals

Lutes v. Treasurer of Missouri

489 S.W.3d 332, 2016 WL 2731940, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 469

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 10, 2016

DocketNo. ED 103488

StatusPublished

This text of 489 S.W.3d 332 (Lutes v. Treasurer of Missouri) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lutes v. Treasurer of Missouri, 489 S.W.3d 332, 2016 WL 2731940, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 469 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James Lutes appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“Commission”) denying his claim for permanent partial and/or total disability benefits from the Second Injury Fund. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The decision of the Commission is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James Lutes appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“Commission”) denying his claim for permanent partial and/or total disability benefits from the Second Injury Fund. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The decision of the Commission is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

489 S.W.3d 332, 2016 WL 2731940, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lutes-v-treasurer-of-missouri-moctapp-2016.