Lutes v. Shenk
285 A.D. 878, 139 N.Y.S.2d 240, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5957
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lutes v. Shenk. Read the opinion of the Court — 285 A.D. 416 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1955·Published
Opinion
Order appealed from unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to respondent. We do not pass upon the question of whether or not the written agreement is illusory. Present — Cohn, J. P., Callahan, Breitel, Botein and Rabin, JJ. [See post, pp. .942, 943.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lutes v. Shenk, 285 A.D. 878, 139 N.Y.S.2d 240, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5957 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).
285 A.D. 878 (Lutes v. Shenk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.