Lutensqui v. Sussman

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Lutensqui v. Sussman

8 Misc. 2d 902, 160 N.Y.S.2d 895, 1957 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3538

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedFebruary 7, 1957

StatusPublished

This text of 8 Misc. 2d 902 (Lutensqui v. Sussman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lutensqui v. Sussman, 8 Misc. 2d 902, 160 N.Y.S.2d 895, 1957 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3538 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The testimony of plaintiff and that of her lay witness, unsupported by expert testimony, is not sufficient to overcome the expert testimony of defendant that the dentures have been adjusted and the teeth are in proper occlusion (Young v. Wybrant, 61 N. Y. S. 2d 473).

The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, without costs.

Hecht, Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The testimony of plaintiff and that of her lay witness, unsupported by expert testimony, is not sufficient to overcome the expert testimony of defendant that the dentures have been adjusted and the teeth are in proper occlusion (Young v. Wybrant, 61 N. Y. S. 2d 473).

The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, without costs.

Hecht, Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 Misc. 2d 902, 160 N.Y.S.2d 895, 1957 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lutensqui-v-sussman-nyappterm-1957.