Lute v. State

314 S.W.2d 98, 166 Tex. Crim. 357, 1958 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 4618
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 11, 1958·No. 29892·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is a conviction for the unlawful possession of a narcotic drug, to-wit, “Heri-on,” with punishment assessed at five years and one day in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without a statement of facts.

In this court, appellant attacks the indictment for the reason that “Herion,” as spelled and as set out therein, is not the same as “heroin,” which is named in the narcotic drug act, Art. 725b, Sec. 1, subsection (12), Vernon’s Ann.P.C. as a derivative of opium, a narcotic drug.

It is apparent that the spelling of the drug in the indictment is a typographical error.

But it is not necessary to dispose of the question for that reason. The indictment alleged that “Herion” was a narcotic drug, and for aught this record shows that allegation was sustained by the proof.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lute v. State, 314 S.W.2d 98, 166 Tex. Crim. 357, 1958 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 4618 (Tex. 1958).

314 S.W.2d 98 (Lute v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Enriquez, Thelma v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2004
Cantu v. State
944 S.W.2d 669 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1997)
Perkins v. State
628 S.W.2d 112 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1981)
Ex Parte Charles
582 S.W.2d 836 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1979)
Ablon v. State
537 S.W.2d 267 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1976)
Smith v. State
496 S.W.2d 90 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1973)
In Re Cockrell
493 S.W.2d 620 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1973)
Daltwas v. State
375 S.W.2d 732 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1964)