Luster v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Luster v. State

1928 OK CR 192, 267 P. 1118, 40 Okla. Crim. 145, 1928 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 173

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMay 19, 1928

DocketNo. A-6856.

StatusPublished

This text of 1928 OK CR 192 (Luster v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Luster v. State, 1928 OK CR 192, 267 P. 1118, 40 Okla. Crim. 145, 1928 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 173 (Okla. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a judgment and sentence of the district court of Okmulgee county, rendered July 1, 1927, on a plea of guilty entered to an information, charging that in said county, on the 17th day of May, 1927, the defendant, Harry Luster, did unlawfully, willfully, and feloniously shoot at one W. M. Shelton, and Bert Martin with a pistol, with the felonious intent to kill said persons. The petition in error and transcript of the record proper was filed in this court on December 28, 1927. On May 15, 1928, the plaintiff in error, by his counsel of record, L. A. Wallace, filed in this court a motion to withdraw and dismiss his appeal herein. Which motion is sustained, and the appeal herein is dismissed, and the cause remanded to the lower court, with direction to enforce its judgment. Mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a judgment and sentence of the district court of Okmulgee county, rendered July 1, 1927, on a plea of guilty entered to an information, charging that in said county, on the 17th day of May, 1927, the defendant, Harry Luster, did unlawfully, willfully, and feloniously shoot at one W. M. Shelton, and Bert Martin with a pistol, with the felonious intent to kill said persons. The petition in error and transcript of the record proper was filed in this court on December 28, 1927. On May 15, 1928, the plaintiff in error, by his counsel of record, L. A. Wallace, filed in this court a motion to withdraw and dismiss his appeal herein. Which motion is sustained, and the appeal herein is dismissed, and the cause remanded to the lower court, with direction to enforce its judgment. Mandate forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1928 OK CR 192, 267 P. 1118, 40 Okla. Crim. 145, 1928 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/luster-v-state-oklacrimapp-1928.