Lusk v. Stonecoal Branch Mining, Inc.

77 F. App'x 665
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 10, 2003
DocketNo. 03-1496
StatusPublished

This text of 77 F. App'x 665 (Lusk v. Stonecoal Branch Mining, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lusk v. Stonecoal Branch Mining, Inc., 77 F. App'x 665 (4th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Earnel Lusk seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (2000). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. See Lusk v. Stonecoal Branch Mining, Inc., No. 02-713 BLA (BRB Apr. 11, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 901-945
30 U.S.C. § 901-945
§ 901
30 U.S.C. § 901

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
77 F. App'x 665, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lusk-v-stonecoal-branch-mining-inc-ca4-2003.