Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Lusk v. State

Lusk v. State

110 S.E. 520, 27 Ga. App. 593, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 291
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 16, 1921
Docket12650
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 110 S.E. 520 (Lusk v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lusk v. State, 110 S.E. 520, 27 Ga. App. 593, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 291 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

The court properly admitted, the evidence referred to in the only special ground of the motion for a new trial; the evidence amply supported the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge, and, no error of law appearing, the motion for a new trial was properly overruled.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur. Clay & Blair, for plaintiff in error. John T. Dorsey, solicitor-general pro tem., contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Edenfield v. State
152 S.E. 615 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
110 S.E. 520, 27 Ga. App. 593, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lusk-v-state-gactapp-1921.