Lusk v. State

110 S.E. 520, 27 Ga. App. 593, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 291
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 16, 1921·No. 12650·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

The court properly admitted, the evidence referred to in the only special ground of the motion for a new trial; the evidence amply supported the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge, and, no error of law appearing, the motion for a new trial was properly overruled.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur. Clay & Blair, for plaintiff in error. John T. Dorsey, solicitor-general pro tem., contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lusk v. State, 110 S.E. 520, 27 Ga. App. 593, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 291 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

110 S.E. 520 (Lusk v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Edenfield v. State
152 S.E. 615 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)