Lusk v. State

802 So. 2d 437, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17482, 2001 WL 1578390
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 12, 2001
DocketNo. 4D01-4408
StatusPublished

This text of 802 So. 2d 437 (Lusk v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lusk v. State, 802 So. 2d 437, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17482, 2001 WL 1578390 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to appellant raising his claim in a properly filed motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 which meets the pleading requirements of State v. Mancino, 714 So.2d 429, 433 (Fla.1998), or a motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to rule 3.850.

GUNTHER, WARNER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Mancino
714 So. 2d 429 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
802 So. 2d 437, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17482, 2001 WL 1578390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lusk-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.