Lusk v. Midland Credit Management Inc
This text of Lusk v. Midland Credit Management Inc (Lusk v. Midland Credit Management Inc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA COURTNEY LUSK, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) CASE NO: CV-24-381-R Vv. ) ) MIDLAND CREDIT ) MANAGEMENT, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint [Doc. 14]. During the pendency of the Motion, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint [Doc. 15]. The Amended Complaint “supersedes the original and renders it of no legal effect.” Davis v. TXO Prod. Corp., 929 F.2d 1515, 1517 (10 Cir. 1991) (internal quotation omitted). Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 14] is therefore DENIED without prejudice to resubmission, 1f appropriate. IT IS SO ORDERED this 11" day of July, 2024.
DAVID L. RUSSELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lusk v. Midland Credit Management Inc, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lusk-v-midland-credit-management-inc-okwd-2024.