Lusk v. Langham

157 A.D. 942, 142 N.Y.S. 1128

This text of 157 A.D. 942 (Lusk v. Langham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lusk v. Langham, 157 A.D. 942, 142 N.Y.S. 1128 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).

Opinion

Judgment reversed and new trial granted before another referee, with costs to appellant to abide event, unless the plaintiffs shall within ten days stipulate to reduce the amount of the fund by the amount of the debts owing by Charles Lusk, the husband of the grantor named in the deed in question, but not to exceed the amount paid therefor by John D. Langham," in which event the judgment is modified accordingly and as so modified is affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Held, that the referee improperly struck out the evidence relating to such debts and that the same to the extent above indicated should have been allowed by him against the funds in the hands of the defendant. Settle order before Mr. Justice Robson on two days’ notice. All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
157 A.D. 942, 142 N.Y.S. 1128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lusk-v-langham-nyappdiv-1913.