Lusk v. Commissioner

1955 T.C. Memo. 119, 14 T.C.M. 435, 1955 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 221
CourtUnited States Tax Court
DecidedMay 12, 1955
DocketDocket No. 40652.
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1955 T.C. Memo. 119 (Lusk v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lusk v. Commissioner, 1955 T.C. Memo. 119, 14 T.C.M. 435, 1955 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 221 (tax 1955).

Opinion

William Lusk and Lillian Lusk v. Commissioner.
Lusk v. Commissioner
Docket No. 40652.
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1955-119; 1955 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 221; 14 T.C.M. (CCH) 435; T.C.M. (RIA) 55119;
May 12, 1955

*221 1. Held, the Commissioner properly determined petitioners' net income, except for failing to make any allowance for depreciation for the years 1942 through 1945, in each of the taxable years involved.

2. Held, at least part of the deficiency in each of the taxable years 1942 to 1945, inclusive, was due to fraud with intent to evade tax.

3. Held, the statute of limitations has not run on any of the taxable years.

4. Held, petitioners are liable for 5 per cent additions to tax for the taxable years 1946 and 1947 under section 293(a)of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939.

William Lusk, 5218 W. 30th Street, Cicero, Ill., pro se. Ray H. Garrison, Esq., for the respondent.

BRUCE

Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion

BRUCE, Judge: Respondent determined deficiencies in the income tax of petitioners and additions to tax as follows:

SectionSection
293(b)293(a)
AdditionsAdditions
YearIncome Taxto Taxto Tax
1942$ 1,856.15$ 928.08
1943832.44416.22
194410,300.195,150.10
194533,071.4116,535.21
19461,954.39$97.72
1947835.7641.79

The issues for decision are:

1. Did petitioners understate*222 their net income in each of the taxable years as determined by the Commissioner.

2. Are petitioners liable for 50 per cent additions to tax for the years 1942 to 1945, inclusive, under section 293(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939.

3. Are petitioners liable for 5 per cent additions to tax for the years 1946 and 1947 under section 293(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939.

4. Is the assessment of the deficiency for any of the taxable years barred by the statute of limitations.

Findings of Fact

William Lusk, formerly known as William Zalusky, and Lillian Lusk were husband and wife who, during the taxable years involved, resided in Cicero, Illinois. They filed a joint income tax return for each of the taxable years involved with the collector of internal revenue for the first district of Illinois.

William Lusk (hereinafter referred to as Lusk) was born in 1906. He and Lillian were married in 1932, divorced in 1933, remarried in 1934, and divorced again following Lillian's divorce suit filed in 1947. They have three children, the youngest being born in 1943.

During the taxable years involved Lusk was engaged in selling automobiles, boats, motorcycles and farm machinery*223 in Cicero, Illinois. He did business under the name of "Cicero Boat & Motorcycle Sales" until 1946 when he changed the name of the business to "Outdoor Equipment Sales." In addition to the above business, petitioners operated a farm in Wayne County, Illinois. Petitioners received oil royalties and rental income and traded on the stock market. Lusk also made several inventions including a winch which a truck can use to pull itself out of the mire, a self-rocking baby cradle, a motor which can be adapted to many uses, and small power snippers.

Neither of the petitioners kept formal books of account for any of the taxable years involved, and the only records available for the years 1942 to 1945, inclusive, were a police book purportedly showing the date of purchase and sale of used cars. Petitioners did not maintain records which clearly reflected their income for those years. Their records for 1946 and 1947 were incomplete and fragmentary, consisting of a cardboard box of unclassified bills, invoices, sales slips and the like. However, the Commissioner based his determination of petitioners' net income for the years 1946 and 1947 on these records.

Petitioners did not have a checking*224 account. Lusk maintained a savings account at the Cicero State Bank, Cicero, Illinois. There was $1,015.15 and $30.10 in this account on December 31, 1941 and December 31, 1946, respectively. Petitioners rented a safety deposit box in the above bank beginning in 1936.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Howell v. Commissioner
10 T.C. 859 (U.S. Tax Court, 1948)
Hurley v. Commissioner
22 T.C. 1256 (U.S. Tax Court, 1954)
Vassallo v. Commissioner
23 T.C. 656 (U.S. Tax Court, 1955)
Halle v. Commissioner
7 T.C. 245 (U.S. Tax Court, 1946)
Estate of Gibbs v. Commissioner
21 T.C. 443 (U.S. Tax Court, 1954)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1955 T.C. Memo. 119, 14 T.C.M. 435, 1955 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lusk-v-commissioner-tax-1955.