Lushann International Energy Corp. v. Harris County

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 11, 2008
Docket01-07-00119-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Lushann International Energy Corp. v. Harris County (Lushann International Energy Corp. v. Harris County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lushann International Energy Corp. v. Harris County, (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion



In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

____________


NO. 01-07-00119-CV


LUSHANN INTERNATIONAL ENERGY CORP., Appellant


V.


HARRIS COUNTY, Appellee





On Appeal from the 61st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2006-10354





MEMORANDUM OPINION

          Appellee, Harris County, filed a motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction. This Court requested a response by appellant, Lushann International Energy Corp., by April 6, 2007. Appellant filed two motions for extension of time to file the response, extending the filing deadline until July 11, 2007. To date, no response has been filed.

          The trial court rendered judgment on June 22, 2006, and appellant timely filed a motion for new trial on July 21, 2006. Thus, appellant’s notice of appeal was due within 90 days after the judgment was signed, which was September 20, 2006. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a)(1). Appellant did not file a notice of appeal by September 20, 2006. However, appellant filed what purported to be a notice of restricted appeal in February 2007. A restricted appeal is only available to a party “who did not timely file a postjudgment motion . . . .” See Tex. R. App. P. 30. Because appellant timely filed a motion for new trial, we lack jurisdiction over this restricted appeal. Clopton v. Pak, 66 S.W.3d 513, 515 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2001, pet. denied); see Wright Bros. Energy, Inc. v. Krough, 67 S.W.3d 271, 273 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, no pet.). We dismiss this appeal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Nuchia, Alcala, and Hanks.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Clopton v. Chi-Suk Pak
66 S.W.3d 513 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2001)
Wright Bros. Energy, Inc. v. Krough
67 S.W.3d 271 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lushann International Energy Corp. v. Harris County, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lushann-international-energy-corp-v-harris-county-texapp-2008.