Luse v. Oaks
This text of 36 Iowa 562 (Luse v. Oaks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— The plaintiff filed her petition claiming of defendants $5,000 damages for slanderous words spoken by one of defendants, Mary Oaks, the wife of the other defendant, Nicholas Oaks. The defendant Nicholas Oaks demurred, upon the ground that he is not jointly liable for slander committed by his wife. The court sustained the demurrer, and plaintiff appeals.
This precise question was decided adversely to this ruling of the court in McElfresh v. Kirkendall at the present term, ante, 224. Following that decision the judgment is
Eeversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
36 Iowa 562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/luse-v-oaks-iowa-1873.