Lurry v. State
479 So. 2d 149, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2485, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16546
This text of 479 So. 2d 149 (Lurry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Lurry v. State, 479 So. 2d 149, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2485, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16546 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).
Opinion
The trial court used impermissible reasons as the basis for departing from the sentencing guidelines. Hendrix v. State, 475 So.2d 1218 (Fla.1985); Knowlton v. State, 466 So.2d 278 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). Accordingly, we reverse and vacate the sentence and remand with directions to the trial court to impose a sentence consistent with the sentencing guidelines.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Knowlton v. State
466 So. 2d 278 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Hendrix v. State
475 So. 2d 1218 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
479 So. 2d 149, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2485, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lurry-v-state-fladistctapp-1985.