Lurry v. State
479 So. 2d 149, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2485, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16546
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lurry v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 22238 →
Opinion
The trial court used impermissible reasons as the basis for departing from the sentencing guidelines. Hendrix v. State, 475 So.2d 1218 (Fla.1985); Knowlton v. State, 466 So.2d 278 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). Accordingly, we reverse and vacate the sentence and remand with directions to the trial court to impose a sentence consistent with the sentencing guidelines.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lurry v. State, 479 So. 2d 149, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2485, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16546 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).
479 So. 2d 149 (Lurry v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Knowlton v. State
466 So. 2d 278 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Hendrix v. State
475 So. 2d 1218 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)