Luro Products Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Luro Products Co. v. United States

58 Cust. Ct. 890, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1852

United States Customs Court·Decided May 16, 1967·No. No. P67/162; protests 63/13650, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Oliver, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of electric motors similar in all material respects to those the subject of James G. Wiley Co., a/c Ungar Electric Tools, Inc. v. United States (49 Cust. Ct. 199, Abstract 66961), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

[891] (Note : The following protests were decided by a special first division consisting of Oliver, WatsoN, and'IÍAO, Judges.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oliver, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of electric motors similar in all material respects to those the subject of James G. Wiley Co., a/c Ungar Electric Tools, Inc. v. United States (49 Cust. Ct. 199, Abstract 66961), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

[891] (Note : The following protests were decided by a special first division consisting of Oliver, WatsoN, and'IÍAO, Judges.)

Luro Products Co. v. United States, 58 Cust. Ct. 890, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1852 (cusc 1967).

Pincite

58 Cust. Ct. 890 (Luro Products Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related