Lurie v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co.

29 A.D.3d 538, 813 N.Y.S.2d 670

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Brooklyn Union Gas Company, also known as Keyspan Energy Delivery, Inc., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ruchelsman, J.), dated January 24, 2005, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the appellant’s contentions, it did not establish a prima facie case for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it. The appellant failed to submit sufficient evidence in admissible form, demonstrating the absence of a triable issue of fact regarding whether it created the alleged hazard (see Rengifo v City of New York, 7 AD3d 773 [2004]). Goldstein, J.P., Mastro, Rivera and Lunn, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lurie v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co., 29 A.D.3d 538, 813 N.Y.S.2d 670 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

29 A.D.3d 538 (Lurie v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rengifo v. City of New York
7 A.D.3d 773 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)