Luri v. Republic Services, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Luri v. Republic Services, Inc.

971 N.E.2d 944, 132 Ohio St. 3d 316

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 3, 2012

DocketNos. 2011-1097 and 2011-1120

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 971 N.E.2d 944 (Luri v. Republic Services, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Luri v. Republic Services, Inc., 971 N.E.2d 944, 132 Ohio St. 3d 316 (Ohio 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} The certified question in case No. 2011-1097 is answered in the negative, and the cross-appellants’ first proposition of law in case No. 2011-1120 is sustained. Appellant’s discretionary appeal in case No. 2011-1120 is moot. The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded for application of Havel v. Villa St. Joseph, 131 Ohio St.3d 235, 2012-Ohio-552, 963 N.E.2d 1270.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur. Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, L.L.P., Robin G. Weaver, Stephen P. Anway, and Trevor G. Covey, for appellants in case No. 2011-1097 and for appellees and cross-appellants in case No. 2011-1120.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} The certified question in case No. 2011-1097 is answered in the negative, and the cross-appellants’ first proposition of law in case No. 2011-1120 is sustained. Appellant’s discretionary appeal in case No. 2011-1120 is moot. The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded for application of Havel v. Villa St. Joseph, 131 Ohio St.3d 235, 2012-Ohio-552, 963 N.E.2d 1270.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur. Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, L.L.P., Robin G. Weaver, Stephen P. Anway, and Trevor G. Covey, for appellants in case No. 2011-1097 and for appellees and cross-appellants in case No. 2011-1120.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

971 N.E.2d 944, 132 Ohio St. 3d 316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/luri-v-republic-services-inc-ohio-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack