Lurding v. United States
This text of 191 F.2d 921 (Lurding v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal of Joseph L. Lurding, for the second time convicted by jury verdict of wilfully and knowingly attempting to defeat and evade a large part of his income taxes for the calendar years 1943 through 1946 in violation of section 145(b), Title 26, U.S.C.A., has been heard on the record and on the oral arguments and briefs of the respective attorneys for appellant and the United States;
And it appearing from the record that there was abundant substantial evidence upon which appellant could be properly convicted of the offense charged against him; and that the trial court committed no reversible error upon retrial of the case, but followed faithfully the directions of this court in Lurding v. United States, 6 Cir., 179 F.2d 419, and delivered a carefully prepared and correct written charge to the jury;
The judgment of conviction and sentence entered in the district court upon the verdict of the jury is ordered to be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
191 F.2d 921, 41 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 170, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 3280, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lurding-v-united-states-ca6-1951.