Lupton v. . Spencer

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Lupton v. . Spencer

96 S.E. 889, 176 N.C. 687, 1918 N.C. LEXIS 326

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lupton v. . Spencer. Read the opinion of the Court — 173 N.C. 126 →

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 2, 1918·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

There are thirty-five assignments of error relating to tbe evidence, and four to tbe charge of tbe court. We are of opinion that they are without substantial merit, and that no reversible error has been committed.

Tbe issues relate solely to tbe true location of tbe dividing line between tbe lands of plaintiff and defendant, and present almost exclusively a question of fact, which has been settled by the verdict.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

There are thirty-five assignments of error relating to tbe evidence, and four to tbe charge of tbe court. We are of opinion that they are without substantial merit, and that no reversible error has been committed.

Tbe issues relate solely to tbe true location of tbe dividing line between tbe lands of plaintiff and defendant, and present almost exclusively a question of fact, which has been settled by the verdict.

No error.

Lupton v. . Spencer, 96 S.E. 889, 176 N.C. 687, 1918 N.C. LEXIS 326 (N.C. 1918).

Pincite

96 S.E. 889 (Lupton v. . Spencer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.