Lupson v. Zink

Ohio Supreme Court

Lupson v. Zink

5 Ohio Law. Abs. 124

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 24, 1926

DocketNo. 20189

StatusPublished

This text of 5 Ohio Law. Abs. 124 (Lupson v. Zink) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lupson v. Zink, 5 Ohio Law. Abs. 124 (Ohio 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

This case involves the construction of Sec. 1685 GC., which provides that a Court of record determine and adjudicate matters submitted to it within thirty days after such submission. The question involved is:—

Whether this statute is mandatory and must be observed by the Courts or whether it is simply directory and may be disregarded by the Court if it so desires.

Note — Motion to certify overruled, 5 Abs. 44.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This case involves the construction of Sec. 1685 GC., which provides that a Court of record determine and adjudicate matters submitted to it within thirty days after such submission. The question involved is:—

Whether this statute is mandatory and must be observed by the Courts or whether it is simply directory and may be disregarded by the Court if it so desires.

Note — Motion to certify overruled, 5 Abs. 44.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 Ohio Law. Abs. 124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lupson-v-zink-ohio-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack